Hallenbeck v. Chapman

58 A. 1096, 71 N.J.L. 477, 42 Vroom 477, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 7, 1904·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

This is a suit for three months’ rent reserved under a written lease. The lease contains the usual covenants and a clause 'by which the lessee will keep the prem-. ises in as good repair as.the same shall be at the commencement of the term, &c.

At the trial it was proposed to recoup damages to be set off against the rents sued for, on the ground that at the time of the making of the lease the lessor had orally agreed to make certain repairs which he had not made, to the damage of the defendant.

The District Court rightly overruled this offer to prove. It was a proposition to change the terms of a written lease by oral evidence. Such testimony is inadmissible. Naumherg v. Young, 15 Vroom 331.

[478]*478An oral agreement to surrender premises on condition that the tenant should not be held on his covenant in the lease to leave the premises in as good repair as when rented, it is held, after surrender, is not admissible in a suit upon the lease for breach of covenant to repair contained in the lease. Snowhill v. Reed, 20 Vroom 292.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallenbeck v. Chapman, 58 A. 1096, 71 N.J.L. 477, 42 Vroom 477, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 64 (N.J. 1904).

58 A. 1096 (Hallenbeck v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.