Hallenbeck v. Bradt

2 Paige Ch. 316
New York Court of Chancery·Decided December 3, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that such an acknowledgment was insufficient. That the acknowledgment and consent of the wife must be taken before one of the masters of this court, who was competent to understand the nature and extent of her equitable right to a provision out of her separate property before it could be claimed by the husband. That it should appear from the certificate of the master that on a private examination of the wife he had fully explained to her the nature and extent of her rights, and that she voluntarily consented to relinquish them in favor of the husband, either absolutely, or on the terms and conditions specified in such certificate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallenbeck v. Bradt, 2 Paige Ch. 316 (N.Y. 1830).

2 Paige Ch. 316 (Hallenbeck v. Bradt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weise v. Welsh
30 N.J. Eq. 431 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)