Hallen v. Thompson

48 Misc. 642, 96 N.Y.S. 142
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Misc. 642 (Hallen v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hallen v. Thompson, 48 Misc. 642, 96 N.Y.S. 142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendants by the terms of which the plaintiff was to give two theatrical performances per day, at the Colonial Music Hall, from'April 10, 1905, to April 16, 1905, both days inclusive, which included Sunday. On reporting at the Music Hall on April tenth, plaintiff was informed that his services were not wanted. He sued for breach of contract, and obtained judgment in his favor for $300, the full amount of his claim; and [643]*643costs. The defense is mainly based upon the statutes commonly called the Sunday laws. It seems to us that the defense was well taken, and the contract was void as being in violation of said statutes. See Penal Code, §§ 263, 265, 277; Greater N. Y. charter, § 1481; Mayor v. Eden Musée, 102 N. Y. 593.

Present: Scott, Gildeeslebve and MacLean, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albera v. Sciaretti
72 Misc. 496 (New York Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Misc. 642, 96 N.Y.S. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallen-v-thompson-nyappterm-1905.