Hallan v. Hallan

444 N.W.2d 896, 233 Neb. 261, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 365
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 1989·No. 87-336·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this dissolution of marriage case, respondent husband appeals from the trial court’s division of property, asserting insufficiency of the interest awarded him in his wife’s retirement funds and objecting to the trial court’s inclusion as a marital asset of a portion of a settlement he received from an action he had filed against a former employer, following his sixth and final involuntary termination of employment.

The ultimate test in determining the appropriateness of the division of property is reasonableness as determined by the facts in each case. Busekist v. Busekist, 224 Neb. 510, 398 N.W.2d 722 (1987). We have reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, and we have determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion with regard to either of the matters of which complaint is made. The decree of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallan v. Hallan, 444 N.W.2d 896, 233 Neb. 261, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 365 (Neb. 1989).

444 N.W.2d 896 (Hallan v. Hallan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preston v. Preston
486 N.W.2d 902 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
Hildebrand v. Hildebrand
477 N.W.2d 1 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Helms v. Helms
452 N.W.2d 269 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)