Hallam v. Jacks

11 Ohio St. (N.S.) 692
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1860·Published

Opinion

By the court.

Where the parties, on an appeal from a justice of the peace, proceed to trial before a jury, upon the transcript of the justice, without pleadings, and, no objection being taken, there is a verdict and judgment, the judgment will not be reversed on error, for such irregularity.

A charge of the court, found among the papers, indorsed-by the judge as the charge given by him, in the case, to the jury, but forming part of no bill of exceptions, will not be: regarded as a part of the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallam v. Jacks, 11 Ohio St. (N.S.) 692 (Ohio 1860).

11 Ohio St. (N.S.) 692 (Hallam v. Jacks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.