Hallam v. Grant

Supreme Court

Hallam v. Grant

280 U.S. 522, 50 S. Ct. 82

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 25, 1929·No. No. 472·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further' herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial federal question upon which a writ of certiorari can be issued. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. [523] The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Mr. William H. Hallam, pro se, for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further' herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial federal question upon which a writ of certiorari can be issued. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. [523] The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Mr. William H. Hallam, pro se, for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

Hallam v. Grant, 280 U.S. 522, 50 S. Ct. 82 (1929).

Pincite

280 U.S. 522 (Hallam v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related