Hallahan v. United States

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 95-1290


DAVID C. HALLAHAN,



                                     Petitioner,



                                          v.



                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,



                                     Respondent.


____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            David C. Hallahan on brief pro se.
            _________________

            Donald  K. Stern, United  States Attorney,  and Timothy Q. Feeley,
            ________________                                _________________

        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.


____________________



                                    August 8, 1995

                                 ____________________



Per Curiam.  We have  carefully reviewed the record.  We
                 __________



            affirm for substantially the reasons  stated in part B of the



            district court's opinion.  Petitioner's allegations  were too



            conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.



                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.  
                 ________


-2-