Halladay v. Board of Parole
This text of 471 P.3d 822 (Halladay v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted July 2, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid August 19, 2020
JEFFREY D. HALLADAY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A172740 471 P3d 822
Jeffrey D. Halladay filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid. Cite as 306 Or App 136 (2020) 137
PER CURIAM Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of two rules of the Board of Parole and Post- Prison Supervision, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255- 060-0012(1). Petitioner argues that OAR 255-060-0006(1) exceeds the statutory authority of the board under ORS 144.280(1)(a) and (b), and that OAR 255-060-0012(1) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and ex post facto prohibi- tions under the state and federal constitutions. We have con- sidered those challenges and reject them without additional published discussion. OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 P.3d 822, 306 Or. App. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halladay-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-2020.