Hall Vs. Dist. Ct. (Oswalt, M.D.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GLADE L. HALL, No. 79822 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE FILED

DAVID A. HARDY, DISTRICT JUDGE, NOV 0 7 ;:.!019 Respondents,

::!7:10',11.111

and CIE, •ECOURT

JILL OSWALT, M.D.; AND MICHAEL BY DEPUTY C-LERK

GERBER, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, a writ of prohibition, challenging a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment and a district court order adjudicating an attorney lien.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA tip•rile

(0) 1467A an4PID

10311111111K

NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

pi J. J.

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Glade L. Hall

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A stWttz 2