Hall v. Worley
25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310
Opinion
The action being against the administrator of a married woman upon a promissory note signed by herself and her ¡husband, the defense to which was that she signed as surety only, and the evidence being conflicting as to whether in executing the note she contracted as a surety or as a principal in her own name and right, it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant. Judgment reversad.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Worley, 25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 698 (Hall v. Worley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holmes v. Holmes
39 S.E. 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)