Hall v. Worley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hall v. Worley

25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 18, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 698 (Hall v. Worley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Worley, 25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The action being against the administrator of a married woman upon a promissory note signed by herself and her ¡husband, the defense to which was that she signed as surety only, and the evidence being conflicting as to whether in executing the note she contracted as a surety or as a principal in her own name and right, it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant. Judgment reversad.

Tbe court ruled out the testimony of plaintiff, and directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff excepted.

G. A. Worley, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The action being against the administrator of a married woman upon a promissory note signed by herself and her ¡husband, the defense to which was that she signed as surety only, and the evidence being conflicting as to whether in executing the note she contracted as a surety or as a principal in her own name and right, it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant. Judgment reversad.

Tbe court ruled out the testimony of plaintiff, and directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff excepted.

G. A. Worley, for plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-worley-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack