Hall v. Worley

25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 18, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The action being against the administrator of a married woman upon a promissory note signed by herself and her ¡husband, the defense to which was that she signed as surety only, and the evidence being conflicting as to whether in executing the note she contracted as a surety or as a principal in her own name and right, it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant. Judgment reversad.

Tbe court ruled out the testimony of plaintiff, and directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff excepted. G. A. Worley, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Worley, 25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 310 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 698 (Hall v. Worley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. Holmes
39 S.E. 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)