Hall v. Watson
This text of Hall v. Watson (Hall v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6758
VINCENT JOHN HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES DAVID WATSON; TRACY FINKLEA, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03110-RBH)
Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hall v. Watson, No. 6:06-cv-03110-RBH (D.S.C. May 11, 2007).
Hall’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense
is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hall v. Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-watson-ca4-2007.