HALL v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 17, 2025·No. 24-103·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-103T (Filed: January 17, 2025) NOT FOR PUBLICATION ************************************* VIVIAN HALL, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ************************************* ORDER Plaintiffs Vivian Hall and Prescilla Skank, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this Court for grievances related to allegedly incorrect tax assessments, penalties, and liens, in addition to contract violations and a variety of other claims. See Compl. (ECF 1). This Court granted the government’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 9) but provided Plaintiffs with leave to file an amended complaint, no later than November 21, 2024, pleading facts in support of specific legal theories within this Court’s jurisdiction. See Opinion and Order (ECF 10). When the Clerk served the Opinion and Order on Plaintiffs at their last known address, it was returned as undeliverable. See Clerk Note (ECF 11). I then stayed the case until January 3, 2025 and ordered the government to serve Plaintiffs with the Opinion and Order if it was aware of their address. See Order Staying Case (ECF 12). The government attempted to serve Plaintiffs at multiple addresses on December 6, 2024. See Status Rep. (ECF 13). Plaintiffs have not responded and the time to amend has expired. The case is therefore DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the original Opinion and Order. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Stephen S. Schwartz STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL v. United States, (uscfc 2025).

HALL v. United States (HALL v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.