Hall v. United States

4 M.J. 603
U.S. Army Court of Military Review·Decided October 25, 1977·No. CM 434228·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF INNOCENCE

PER CURIAM:

On 17 September 1976 this Court set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence in appellant’s case because it was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of appellant’s guilt.

[604] Appellant has now petitioned this Court to issue him a certificate of innocence under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2513.* This we are unable to do. While we were unpersuaded that appellant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt, we are not able to assert from this record of trial that appellant “did not commit any of the acts charged” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2513(a)(2) before a certificate can issue. Nor could we hold that appellant “did not by misconduct or neglect cause or bring about his own prosecution” which is another statutory prerequisite.

Consequently, the Petition for a Certificate of Innocence is denied.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. United States, 4 M.J. 603 (usarmymilrev 1977).

4 M.J. 603 (Hall v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State of New York
574 N.E.2d 433 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
McMurry v. United States
15 M.J. 1054 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1983)
McDaniel v. Stewart
7 M.J. 929 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1979)