Hall v. United States Department of Education

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. United States Department of Education

426 F. App'x 188

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 2011

DocketNo. 10-2372

StatusPublished

This text of 426 F. App'x 188 (Hall v. United States Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. United States Department of Education, 426 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Toñita Hall appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing Hall’s civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hall has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Further, we deny as moot the pending motion for an extension of time to file Hall’s informal brief, and deny the pending motions for a restraining order and for waiver of copying and mail fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Toñita Hall appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing Hall’s civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hall has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Further, we deny as moot the pending motion for an extension of time to file Hall’s informal brief, and deny the pending motions for a restraining order and for waiver of copying and mail fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-united-states-department-of-education-ca4-2011.