Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

49 A.2d 872, 160 Pa. Super. 65, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 473

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 21, 1946

DocketAppeal, 165

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 49 A.2d 872 (Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 49 A.2d 872, 160 Pa. Super. 65, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 473 (Pa. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The board adopted the referee’s findings of fact which established that claimant-appellant, with a service rating of thirty-four years as an employe of the Bell Telephone Company, elected to be, and was, retired on a pension of |30.00 per month, although she was only 55 years old and might have retained her position until she became 65 years old. The testimony was oral and conflicting, and the unemployment compensation authori *66 ties resolved the question of credibility against claimant. The findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and they are binding upon us. Unemployment Compensation Law, §510, 43 PS §830. With the essential facts found against her, the contention that she was laid off cannot be sustained. She separated herself from her employment voluntarily. Id. §402 (b), 43 PS §802.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The board adopted the referee’s findings of fact which established that claimant-appellant, with a service rating of thirty-four years as an employe of the Bell Telephone Company, elected to be, and was, retired on a pension of |30.00 per month, although she was only 55 years old and might have retained her position until she became 65 years old. The testimony was oral and conflicting, and the unemployment compensation authori *66 ties resolved the question of credibility against claimant. The findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and they are binding upon us. Unemployment Compensation Law, §510, 43 PS §830. With the essential facts found against her, the contention that she was laid off cannot be sustained. She separated herself from her employment voluntarily. Id. §402 (b), 43 PS §802.

Decision affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.2d 872, 160 Pa. Super. 65, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pasuperct-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack