Hall v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

706 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1874, 1998 WL 81567
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1998·No. No. 96-3462·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PETERSON, Judge.

The Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (“UAC”) filed its Motion for Rehearing asserting as grounds that it did not file an answer brief in this appeal because it never received a copy of the appellant’s initial brief. We ordered a response from appellant by November 11, 1997, and subsequently enlarged that time to January 2, 1998. In view of the failure to respond to our previous orders, we grant the Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion filed October 10, 1997, and affirm the order of the UAC.

MOTION GRANTED; ORDER AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 706 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1874, 1998 WL 81567 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 128 (Hall v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mikolsky v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
721 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)