Hall v. U. S. Department of Justice
This text of Hall v. U. S. Department of Justice (Hall v. U. S. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DONALD and SHERYL HALL,
Plaintiffs,
v. Civil Action 06-01540 (HHK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
Donald and Sheryl Hall bring this action against the United States Department of Justice
(“DOJ”) alleging that the DOJ failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”),
5 U.S.C. §§ 552 et seq, when it redacted large portions of the documents it released to plaintiffs
pursuant to their FOIA request. On February 24, 2009, the court granted in part and denied in
part the DOJ’s second motion for summary judgment, and ordered the DOJ to submit the pages
for which the court did not grant summary judgment, pages 70-72 and 100-130, for in camera
review [#36]. The DOJ submitted these pages to the court on March 16, 2009.
After reviewing the unredacted versions of pages 70-72 and 100-130, the court has
determined that the DOJ properly withheld the redacted portions of these pages pursuant to the
deliberative process exemption. Therefore, the court concludes that summary judgment should
be granted in favor of the DOJ.
An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum.
Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hall v. U. S. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-u-s-department-of-justice-dcd-2009.