Hall v. Twitter Inc.
This text of Hall v. Twitter Inc. (Hall v. Twitter Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sensa Verogna, Plaintiff
v. Case No. 20-cv-536-SM Opinion No. 2022 DNH 103
Twitter, Inc., Defendant
O R D E R
On August 27, 2020, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed anonymously in this litigation and ordered that he disclose his identity. Plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal challenging that decision and this proceeding was stayed. Earlier this month, the Court of Appeals affirmed the court’s decision denying plaintiff’s request to proceed anonymously. Accordingly, on or before September 14, 2022, plaintiff shall file a written notice with the Clerk of Court disclosing his true identity, whereupon the case caption will be amended accordingly.
Given plaintiff’s history of delay in this matter, he should understand that absent truly good cause, the deadline by which he must disclose his identity will not be extended. Failure to comply with this order shall result in dismissal of plaintiff’s action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
SO ORDERED.
_—— teven @. McAuliffe United States District Judge August 29, 2022 cc: Sensa Verogna, pro se Jonathan Eck, Esq. Indraneel Sur, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hall v. Twitter Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-twitter-inc-nhd-2022.