Hall v. Tustall

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 1, 2002
• Docket: 02-6612
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6612

VINCENT JOHN HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY TUSTALL; MAXTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; MAJOR GOINGS; SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-28-5-BO)

Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: October 1, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hall v. Tustall, No. CA-02-28-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 20, 2002). We deny Hall’s motion for default judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED