Hall v. Trivest Partners L.P.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
AARON HALL, et al.,
Plaintiffs, Case No. 22-12743 v. Related Case No. 25-50110
TRIVEST PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Hon. F. Kay Behm Hon. Curtis Ivy, Jr. Defendants. _______________________________/
ORDER STAYING ACTION AND DENYING PENDING MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
On May 23, 2025, the court issued an order denying Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration. Defendants filed notices of appeal as of right on June 9, 2025. ECF Nos. 147, 149; see 9 U.S.C. § 16(a). While “the interlocutory appeal on arbitrability is ongoing,” the district court “must stay its proceedings.” Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 740 (2023). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action and the related miscellaneous action (Case No. 25-50110) are STAYED pending appeal. For administrative purposes and docket efficiency, all pending motions (Case No. 25-50110, ECF No. 11); (Case No. 22-12743, ECF Nos. 105, 130, 135) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 23, 2025 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Trivest Partners L.P. (Hall v. Trivest Partners L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.