Hall v. Tiedeman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hall v. Tiedeman

81 S.E. 868, 141 Ga. 602, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 67

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 23, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 868 (Hall v. Tiedeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Tiedeman, 81 S.E. 868, 141 Ga. 602, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 67 (Ga. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

An action on a note was brought by George W. Tiedeman against J. K. Hall and several others, returnable to the May, 1912, term of the superior court of Montgomery county. On the call of the appearance docket at the return term it appeared that some of the defendants had not been served, and an order was taken to perfect service by the November, 1912, term, and making that term the appearance term of the cause. At that term of the court the case was not called for answer, and was not marked “in default” on the docket, nor was any default judgment entered during that term. On February 4, 1913, the defendant, J. K. Hall, filed with the clerk of the court his plea to the jurisdiction, and also an answer to the merits. Upon the call of the case at the February, 1913, term, the court dismissed the defendant’s plea and answer, upon the ground that the same were not filed in time, and entered up judgment on the note.

1. The statute provides that the judge at each term shall call the appearance docket upon some day previously fixed, or upon the last day <5f the term. Upon such call the cases in which the defendant has not filed a demurrer, plea, answer, or other defense shall be marked “in default.” Civil Code (1910), § 5653. This statute has been construed to mean that unless a case has .been marked “in default,” it is error, on the call of the ease for a hearing, to dismiss the defendant’s plea. because not filed in time. Gordon v. Hudson, 120 Ga. 698 (48 S. E. 131); Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 131 Ga. 701, 707 (63 S. E. 221). The case was not called at the November, 1912, term of the court, which had been by order made the appearance term of the ease, [603]*603nor was there any default judgment entered upon the docket. It was therefore error for the court to dismiss the defendant’s answer to the merits on the ground that the same was not filed at the appearance term.

2. However, there was no 'error in dismissing the plea to the jurisdiction, as it stands upon a different footing from a plea to the merits of the cause, and the time of its filing is fixed by other provisions of the code. A plea to the jurisdiction is a dilatory plea (Civil Code (1910), § 5667), and all dilatory pleas must be filed at the first term (§ 5641). The November, 1912, term was the first term of the case after service of the plaintiff in error, and by order of the court was made the appearance term. The plea to the jurisdiction should have been filed at that term, and it was too late to file it at a subsequent term.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur, except AtTcinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, P. J.

An action on a note was brought by George W. Tiedeman against J. K. Hall and several others, returnable to the May, 1912, term of the superior court of Montgomery county. On the call of the appearance docket at the return term it appeared that some of the defendants had not been served, and an order was taken to perfect service by the November, 1912, term, and making that term the appearance term of the cause. At that term of the court the case was not called for answer, and was not marked “in default” on the docket, nor was any default judgment entered during that term. On February 4, 1913, the defendant, J. K. Hall, filed with the clerk of the court his plea to the jurisdiction, and also an answer to the merits. Upon the call of the case at the February, 1913, term, the court dismissed the defendant’s plea and answer, upon the ground that the same were not filed in time, and entered up judgment on the note.

1. The statute provides that the judge at each term shall call the appearance docket upon some day previously fixed, or upon the last day <5f the term. Upon such call the cases in which the defendant has not filed a demurrer, plea, answer, or other defense shall be marked “in default.” Civil Code (1910), § 5653. This statute has been construed to mean that unless a case has .been marked “in default,” it is error, on the call of the ease for a hearing, to dismiss the defendant’s plea. because not filed in time. Gordon v. Hudson, 120 Ga. 698 (48 S. E. 131); Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 131 Ga. 701, 707 (63 S. E. 221). The case was not called at the November, 1912, term of the court, which had been by order made the appearance term of the ease, [603]*603nor was there any default judgment entered upon the docket. It was therefore error for the court to dismiss the defendant’s answer to the merits on the ground that the same was not filed at the appearance term.

2. However, there was no 'error in dismissing the plea to the jurisdiction, as it stands upon a different footing from a plea to the merits of the cause, and the time of its filing is fixed by other provisions of the code. A plea to the jurisdiction is a dilatory plea (Civil Code (1910), § 5667), and all dilatory pleas must be filed at the first term (§ 5641). The November, 1912, term was the first term of the case after service of the plaintiff in error, and by order of the court was made the appearance term. The plea to the jurisdiction should have been filed at that term, and it was too late to file it at a subsequent term.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur, except AtTcinson, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.E. 868, 141 Ga. 602, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-tiedeman-ga-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack