Hall v. Swart
193 F. 1020, 113 C.C.A. 667, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1117
This text of 193 F. 1020 (Hall v. Swart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hall v. Swart, 193 F. 1020, 113 C.C.A. 667, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1117 (4th Cir. 1912).
Opinion
The appellant was complainant below. She said that the appellee had infringed claim 6 of letters patent No. 730.647, issued June 9, 1903, to Haynie and Halí. The learned judge below dismissed her bill. He held that, in view of the prior art, the combination described in the claim in question was without patentable novelty. We are of the same opinion. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
193 F. 1020, 113 C.C.A. 667, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-swart-ca4-1912.