Hall v. State

373 S.W.2d 252, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 787
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1125
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 1963·No. No. 36124·Published

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of a dangerous drug, to-wit: barbiturates, and his penalty assessed at one year’s confinement in the county jail.

Due to our disposition of this cause, a recitation of the facts is not deemed necessary. The complaint as it appears in the transcript bears the jurat of the assistant District Attorney “Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2d day of July, A.D., 1962.” The complaint alleges that the offense was committed “on or about the 25th day of July, A.D., 1962.” The date on or about which the offense was alleged to have-been committed is subsequent and not anterior to the date the complaint was sworn to. Mitchell v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 255, 340 S.W.2d 301.

The judgment is reversed and the cause: remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 373 S.W.2d 252, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 787 (Tex. 1963).

373 S.W.2d 252 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. State
340 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)