Hall v. State

311 S.W.3d 910, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 814, 2010 WL 2360627
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 2010
DocketWD 70913
StatusPublished

This text of 311 S.W.3d 910 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. State, 311 S.W.3d 910, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 814, 2010 WL 2360627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Eddie D. Hall appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. A jury found Hall guilty of murder in the first degree for the murder of Bobby Roby and not guilty of murder in the second degree for the murder of Angela Ray. On appeal, Hall claims that the motion court erred in failing to grant his motion because Hall’s trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. Specifically, Hall claims that his counsel was ineffective in that he failed to object to the State’s introduction of evidence that Hall’s co-defendant had already been found guilty of the homicides for which Hall was being charged and also failed to object to the State’s mention of that evidence in its argument. We affirm the motion court’s denial of Hall’s motion. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hall
226 S.W.3d 904 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 S.W.3d 910, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 814, 2010 WL 2360627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-moctapp-2010.