Hall v. State

168 S.W.3d 78, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1029, 2005 WL 1545196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 520
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2005·No. No. ED 85272·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harry Hall (“Movant”) was convicted of one count of attempted armed robbery in the first degree, one count of burglary in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced to three concurrent terms of fifteen years imprisonment. Movant filed a direct appeal and this Court affirmed Movant’s conviction in State v. Hall, 81 S.W.3d 577 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Helmig v. State, 42 S.W.3d 658, 665-66 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 168 S.W.3d 78, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1029, 2005 WL 1545196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

168 S.W.3d 78 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helmig v. State
42 S.W.3d 658 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
State v. Hall
81 S.W.3d 577 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)