Hall v. State

770 S.W.2d 371, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 1989 WL 31322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 157
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 1989·No. No. 55411·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted pursuant to guilty pleas of unlawful use of a weapon, assault first degree, assault second degree, two counts of armed criminal action, and illegal possession of cocaine. He was sentenced to a total of ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

Movant asserts ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his guilty pleas involuntary. The motion court found movant’s claims were refuted by the record and did not warrant an evidentiary hearing. Rule 24.035(g).

We find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 770 S.W.2d 371, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 1989 WL 31322 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

770 S.W.2d 371 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.