Hall v. State

44 So. 826, 91 Miss. 216
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The justice of the peace certifies what purports to be the entire record of the proceedings in his court, and no affidavit is referred to there. His testimony evidently referred to a warrant for arrest when he used the word affidavit.” This is too plain for disputation. We have, therefore, a case in which there is no affidavit whatever, and never was one. Neither the justice court nor the circuit court had any jurisdiction.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause dismissed, without prejudice to the bringing against the appellant of any charge founded on a proper affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 44 So. 826, 91 Miss. 216 (Mich. 1907).

44 So. 826 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. State
36 So. 2d 925 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1948)
Morris v. State
79 So. 811 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)