Hall v. State
165 S.E. 466, 45 Ga. App. 519, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 590
This text of 165 S.E. 466 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hall v. State, 165 S.E. 466, 45 Ga. App. 519, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
1. The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved.
2. The verdict was demanded by the evidence and the statement of the defendant to the jury, and, therefore, any error in the charge of the court was harmless. Accordingly, the ground of the motion for a new trial, alleging error in an excerpt from the charge, will not be passed upon. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cauley v. State
203 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Pennington v. State
161 S.E.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Fanning v. State
169 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
165 S.E. 466, 45 Ga. App. 519, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-gactapp-1932.