Hall v. State

91 S.E. 908, 19 Ga. App. 605, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 250
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1917
Docket8315
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 908 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. State, 91 S.E. 908, 19 Ga. App. 605, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 250 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

No error of law is complained of, and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of guilty. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur. Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Tifton—Judge Eve. 'November 4, 1916. J. B. Murrow, for plaintiff in error. J.'S. Bidgdill, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 908, 19 Ga. App. 605, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-gactapp-1917.