Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hall v. State

Hall v. State

134 So. 3d 1125, 2014 WL 464154, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2014·No. No. 4D13-535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept the state’s concession of procedural error, reverse the order finding the appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt, and vacate the sentence imposed. If the court again takes up the contempt motion, it must comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 before it may hold the appellant in indirect criminal contempt. Because we reverse on procedural grounds, there is no need to address the merits of the contempt order at this time.

Reversed and vacated.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 134 So. 3d 1125, 2014 WL 464154, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

134 So. 3d 1125 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.