Hall v. State

814 So. 2d 1254, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020, 2002 WL 851094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 744 So. 2d 517
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2002·No. No. 5D01-2188·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Henry Norris Hall, appeals his sentence and the trial court’s refusal to allow him to withdraw his plea. Appellant contends that there was no agreement at the time of his plea that he could receive an increased sentence if he failed to appear at the scheduled sentencing. The prosecutor recited on the record at the plea hearing that such an agreement had been made, however. Appellant says the record is unclear, but we conclude otherwise. Apart from the dialogue before the prosecution and the court, there is the participation and total acquiescence by both the appellant and his defense counsel. We find no error.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 814 So. 2d 1254, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020, 2002 WL 851094 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

814 So. 2d 1254 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.