Hall v. State

608 So. 2d 878, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 1992 WL 308637

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 598 So. 2d 230 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1992·No. No. 91-2311·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, we certify the same question as Reeves v. State, 593 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA1991):

Does section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorize habitual felon sentencing for a criminal defendant who has previously been convicted of a violent offense enumerated in the statute, but who is currently being sentenced for a non-violent offense?

MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, we certify the same question as Reeves v. State, 593 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA1991):

Does section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorize habitual felon sentencing for a criminal defendant who has previously been convicted of a violent offense enumerated in the statute, but who is currently being sentenced for a non-violent offense?

MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Hall v. State, 608 So. 2d 878, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 1992 WL 308637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

608 So. 2d 878 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Reeves v. State

593 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Opinion

Related