Hall v. State

282 So. 2d 190, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7545
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 So. 2d 90
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 1973·No. No. 73-317·Published

Opinion

MANN, Chief Judge.

Hall’s appeal from denial of his motion for post-conviction relief asserts that he was convicted of a violation of the crime-against-nature statute, Fla.Stat. § 800.01, F.S.A., prior to its invalidation by Franklin v. State, Fla.1971, 257 So.2d 21, and is now held unlawfully. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the Florida finding of unconstitutionality results in a federal constitutional claim entitling a state prisoner to habeas corpus. Huffman v. Thompkins, 5th Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 390; Stone v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 390. Our Supreme Court has, however, stated that Franklin is not to be applied retroactively, and we are bound by that authority. 257 So.2d at 24. See also Judge McNulty’s opinion for this court in Morris v. State, Fla.App.2d 1972, 261 So.2d 563.

Affirmed.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 282 So. 2d 190, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7545 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

282 So. 2d 190 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franklin v. State
257 So. 2d 21 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Morris v. State
261 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)