Hall v. State
933 S.W.2d 363, 326 Ark. 823, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 694
Opinion
Hall petitions for rehearing and cites U.S. v. Gaudin, _ U.S. _, 115 S.Ct. 2310 (1995), for the proposition that our decision improperly failed to entertain the jury-instruction issue raised herein as a structural error. We deny Hall’s petition by pointing out that Gaudin does not hold that an erroneous jury instruction which omits an element of the government’s burden of proof compels a finding of prejudicial error. See also California v. Roy, _ U.S. _, (No. 95-2025, Nov. 4, 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 933 S.W.2d 363, 326 Ark. 823, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 694 (Ark. 1996).
933 S.W.2d 363 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
554 S.W.3d 306 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2018)
Flanagan v. State
243 S.W.3d 866 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2006)
Walley v. State
112 S.W.3d 349 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Peebles v. State
958 S.W.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)
Greene v. State
949 S.W.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)