Hall v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hall v. State

116 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 672

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 476 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 1928·No. 5 Div. 706.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We do not find anything in it connecting the defendant with the possession of the still which was found, or from which such connection might be legally inferred. Eor the error -in refusing to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We do not find anything in it connecting the defendant with the possession of the still which was found, or from which such connection might be legally inferred. Eor the error -in refusing to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Hall v. State, 116 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

116 So. 924 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.