Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Hall v. State

568 So. 2d 873, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 124, 1990 WL 172717

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 So. 2d 1162 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 16, 1990·No. 8 Div. 291·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALA-BAM A SUPREME COURT

McMillan, judge.

In accordance with Ex parte Hall, 557 So.2d 22 (Ala.1990), and Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), it is determined that this cause was affirmed without opinion because the issues raised by the appellant concerning the voluntariness of his statements and their admission into evidence without a hearing outside of the jury’s presence were procedurally barred because there were no objections in circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALA-BAM A SUPREME COURT

McMillan, judge.

In accordance with Ex parte Hall, 557 So.2d 22 (Ala.1990), and Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), it is determined that this cause was affirmed without opinion because the issues raised by the appellant concerning the voluntariness of his statements and their admission into evidence without a hearing outside of the jury’s presence were procedurally barred because there were no objections in circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Hall v. State, 568 So. 2d 873, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 124, 1990 WL 172717 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

568 So. 2d 873 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related