Hall v. State
130 So. 533, 222 Ala. 26, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 441
Opinion
The Court of Appeals dismissed the state’s application for rehearing because of a failure to comply with Rule 38, Supreme Court Practice. Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 891.
f Whether or not the rule should be applied and enforced in the particular case to which the rule applies was a matter addressed to the irrevisable discretion of the Court of Appeals. Caraway v. State, 207 Ala. 588, 93 So. *27 548; Brewington v. State, 19 Ala. App. 409, 97 So. 763.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 130 So. 533, 222 Ala. 26, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 441 (Ala. 1930).
130 So. 533 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardin v. State
162 So. 2d 616 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Wilkerson v. State
21 So. 2d 622 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Melvin v. State
21 So. 2d 277 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1944)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Magouirk
11 So. 2d 462 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1942)