Hall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
MELISSA HALL PLAINTIFF
v. Case No. 6:23-cv-06039
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 13. Judge Bryant recommends that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), denying benefits to Plaintiff, be reversed and remanded pursuant to the Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Bryant’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) in toto. The decision of the ALJ, denying benefits to Plaintiff, is hereby REVERSED. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant to Sentence Four of section 405(g). If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes “not appealable,” i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S. Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of February, 2024. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Hall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.