Hall v. Skavdale
This text of 57 P. 807 (Hall v. Skavdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion is made to dismiss this action for want of jurisdiction on the part of this court to try the same. The case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pacific Supply Co. v. Brand, 7 Wash. 357 (35 Pac. 72), and the motion will therefore be sustained.
It is urged by appellant that no proper service of the motion has been made, but, this being a jurisdictional question, as has often been decided by this court, the motion will be entertained, even upon an oral suggestion at the time of the trial.
The appeal is therefore disinissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 P. 807, 21 Wash. 203, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-skavdale-wash-1899.