Hall v. Simpson

52 A. 4, 203 Pa. 146, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 671
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 135·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff’s testimony established two things only: the mere fact of the accident, and that the ventilating fans were [148] not run day and night. The first was not sufficient to warrant a recovery by an employee, and the second did not give rise to an inference of negligence on the part of the defendants which caused the accident. Except in the abandoned rooms where the workmen were forbidden to go, gas was found in the mine at intervals only, when a fall occurred or a clay vein was struck. The failure to run the fans constantly was only one of a number of causes that might account for the presence of gas in the mine on the morning of the accident, and the constant running of them would not have been effective unless the course of the air currents within the mine had been properly directed. This was a matter committed by act of assembly to one over whom the defendants had no control, and for whose neglect they were not answerable. In the absence of affirmative proof of negligence, the nonsuit was properly granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Simpson, 52 A. 4, 203 Pa. 146, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 671 (Pa. 1902).

52 A. 4 (Hall v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cossette v. Paulton Coal Mining Co.
103 A. 346 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Reeder v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
80 A. 1121 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Saylor v. Chartiers Coal & Coke Co.
31 Pa. Super. 447 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)