Hall v. Simmons

54 S.E. 751, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 283
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 3, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 54 S.E. 751 (Hall v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Simmons, 54 S.E. 751, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 283 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. While delivery is essential to the completion of a gift of personalty, actual manual delivery is not required. Constructive or symbolic delivery is sufficient under certain circumstances. When it appears that the donor has relinquished all dominion and control over the property as owner and parted absolutely with title, the mere fact that the donee allows possession to remain with the donor will not necessarily defeat the gift. Harrold v. Nicholson, 119 Ga. 458, and citations.

2. When in the trial of an action of trover it appears that prior to the institution of the suit the plaintiff had parted with the title to property involved, it is not erroneous to grant a nonsuit at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mashburn v. Wright
420 S.E.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Marshall v. Universal CIT Credit Corp.
175 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. Banks
111 Ga. App. 538 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
CHARLES S. MARTIN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. Banks
142 S.E.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Browder v. Cox
64 S.E.2d 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Berger v. Noble
57 S.E.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Durham v. Crawford
26 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Noras v. McCord
200 S.E. 513 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Croxton v. Barrow
194 S.E. 24 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Ellis v. Rudeseal
192 S.E. 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.
177 S.E. 79 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Bowman v. Chapman
175 S.E. 241 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchie
166 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Underwood v. Underwood
159 S.E. 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Williams v. McElroy
133 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Dunlap-Huckabee Auto Co. v. Central Georgia Automotive Co.
122 S.E. 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Sims v. Nelson
121 S.E. 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Cox v. Fairbanks Co.
116 S.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Lowe v. Bush
107 S.E. 394 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Bank of Adel v. Hutchinson
18 Ga. App. 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.E. 751, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-simmons-ga-1906.