Hall v. Sheriff
This text of 507 P.2d 1039 (Hall v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In this case, the district court correctly determined, contrary to appellant’s contention, that probable cause was established at the preliminary examination to show that embezzlement had been committed by appellant. NRS 205.300; NRS 171.206; State v. Trolson, 21 Nev. 419, 32 P. 930 (1893). See State v. [121]*121Monahan, 50 Nev. 27, 249 P. 566 (1926) and State v. Compton, 450 P.2d 79 (Idaho 1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 P.2d 1039, 89 Nev. 120, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-sheriff-nev-1973.