Hall v. Sheriff
507 P.2d 1039, 89 Nev. 120, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 441
Opinion
OPINION
In this case, the district court correctly determined, contrary to appellant’s contention, that probable cause was established at the preliminary examination to show that embezzlement had been committed by appellant. NRS 205.300; NRS 171.206; State v. Trolson, 21 Nev. 419, 32 P. 930 (1893). See State v. [121] Monahan, 50 Nev. 27, 249 P. 566 (1926) and State v. Compton, 450 P.2d 79 (Idaho 1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Sheriff, 507 P.2d 1039, 89 Nev. 120, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 441 (Neb. 1973).
507 P.2d 1039 (Hall v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Compton
450 P.2d 79 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Trolson
32 P. 930 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1893)
State v. Monahan
249 P. 566 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1926)