Hall v. Sengra Corp.
This text of 438 So. 2d 914 (Hall v. Sengra Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UPON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
Having considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and clarification, we withdraw our opinion of August 9, 1983 and substitute the following:
Finding that the appellant has been compensated by the trial court’s award of out-of-pocket expenses for medical bills and that the record contains no support for application of the collateral source rule, Hartnett v. Riveron, 361 So.2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Janes v. Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc., 349 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 355 So.2d 512 (Fla.1978); Walker v. Hilliard, 329 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Paradis v. Thomas, 150 So.2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963), we affirm.
Affirmed.
NESBITT, J., dissents and would adhere to the opinion of August 9, 1983.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 So. 2d 914, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-sengra-corp-fladistctapp-1983.