Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 17, 2022
Docket20-663
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0663V UNPUBLISHED

DAVID HALL, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 18, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; HUMAN SERVICES, Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Matthew Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On June 1, 2020, David Hall filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a pneumococcal conjugate (“Prevnar-13”) vaccine received on May 31, 2017. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed January 18, 2022, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered in the United States, he experienced residual effects of his condition for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his condition. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 18-19; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the Prevnar-13 vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on January 18, 2022, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $29,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 01/11/2022 2 : 52PM FAX 8288310 238 eag le t ax breaks ~ 0003/0008

1N THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

DAVID HALL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 2o-663V ) Chief Special Muter Corcoran SECRETARY OF ) HEALnI AND HUMAN SERVICES. ) ) Respondent )

STIPULATION

The parties b.ereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. David Hall ("'petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l Oto 34 (the "Vac;;cine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the

pneumococcal conjugate ("Prevnar-13") vaccination. which is a vaccine contain~ in the

Vaccine lnjury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received a Prevnar• 13 vaccine on or about May 3J, 2017.

3. The vaccine wu administen,ci within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleses that he sustained a moulder injury rotated to vaccine administration

(C.SlRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following administration of the PreVDal'- 13 vaccine, or in the alternative, that his alleged shoulder injury was caused-in--fact by the

vaccine. He further alleges that he experienced the residual effects ofthis condition for more

than six months.

5. l>etitioncr represents that there bu been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a. result of his condition. 01 /1 1/2022 2: 53PM FAX 82863 10 238 ea gle t ax bre aks i0 00 4/ 0006

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

Prevuar-13 vaccine oauscd petitionerts alleged shoulder b:tjury, any other injury; and denies that

bis current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine--rclated injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a declaion should be entered awarding the

compensation descn'bed in ~aph 8 ofthis Stipulation.

8. AB soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation. and after petitioner bas tiled an election to ~eive coD'lpensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300u.-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Service& will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lwnp SllDl of$29,00t.OO, in 1hc fonn of a chock payable to petitioner. This amount represents oompensation for all damages that would bo available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(a).

9. At. soon as prac;ticabJe after the entzy ofjudgment on entitlement in this C85C, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(aX1 ), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special ma&ter to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon tbia petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney rtpresent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa~l5(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policiea,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX ofthe Social Security Act (42

U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-1S
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(aX1)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 3QOaa
42 U.S.C. § 3QOaa
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3Q
42 U.S.C. § 3Q

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2022.