Hall v. Schultz
This text of 31 How. Pr. 331 (Hall v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
commissioners of the metropolitan board of health, as such claiming to constitute a board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester. The (alleged) board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester, Thomas 0. Acton, Joseph S. Boswobth, John G. Bergen and Benjamin F. Manierre, commissioners of the metropolitan police, of the metropolitan police district of the stato of New York, “ the board of metropolitan police of the metropolitan police district of the state of New York,” John A. Kennedy and Nathaniel B. Mills, defendants.
John Graham, for plaintiff.
Charles Tracy, George Bliss, Jr., and A. J. Yanderpoel, for defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 How. Pr. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-schultz-nyctcompl-1866.