Hall v. Schultz

New York Court of Common Pleas

Hall v. Schultz

31 How. Pr. 331

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided July 15, 1866·Published

Opinion

commissioners of the metropolitan board of health, as such claiming to constitute a board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester. The (alleged) board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester, Thomas 0. Acton, Joseph S. Boswobth, John G. Bergen and Benjamin F. Manierre, commissioners of the metropolitan police, of the metropolitan police district of the stato of New York, “ the board of metropolitan police of the metropolitan police district of the state of New York,” John A. Kennedy and Nathaniel B. Mills, defendants.

John Graham, for plaintiff.

Charles Tracy, George Bliss, Jr., and A. J. Yanderpoel, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

commissioners of the metropolitan board of health, as such claiming to constitute a board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester. The (alleged) board of excise, in and for the metropolitan police district of the state of New York, excepting and excluding the county of Westchester, Thomas 0. Acton, Joseph S. Boswobth, John G. Bergen and Benjamin F. Manierre, commissioners of the metropolitan police, of the metropolitan police district of the stato of New York, “ the board of metropolitan police of the metropolitan police district of the state of New York,” John A. Kennedy and Nathaniel B. Mills, defendants.

John Graham, for plaintiff.

Charles Tracy, George Bliss, Jr., and A. J. Yanderpoel, for defendants.

Hall v. Schultz, 31 How. Pr. 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1866).

Pincite

31 How. Pr. 331 (Hall v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.