Hall v. Roehr & Co.
Opinion
1. Under the mandatory provisions of the constitution of this State — article 6, section 16 (Civil Code of 1910, § 6543) — the venue of all civil eases is in the county where the defendant resides,'except in certain cases specified in paragraphs 1 to 5 (inclusive) of the said article. A trover suit is a civil ease, and is not among the exceptions to the general rule. Where, therefore, a timely and sufficient plea to the jurisdiction of the court was filed, on the ground that the defendant was not a resident of the county in which the suit was [380]*380brought, it was error for the trial judge to strike this plea, and the issue therein made should have been submitted to the jury.
2. The giving of a bond for the forthcoming of the property in a trover suit, where bail is required, is in a sense an appearance by the defendant, yet it is not such appearance and pleading to the merits of the case as would constitute a waiver of jurisdiction. To complete such waiver there must not only be a general appearance, but also pleading to the merits. Civil Code (1910), § 5664.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
73 S.E. 550 (Hall v. Roehr & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.