Hall v. Reserve Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Hall v. Reserve Life Ins. Co.

263 S.W.2d 933, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 638

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided January 15, 1954·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants instituted this action against the appellee to recover some $700 on a medical benefits and accident policy. The insuring clause of the policy contained the following exclusion provision:

“(b) resulting from sickness which originates while this policy is in effect and more than fifteen days after the date hereof, hereinafter referred to as such sickness; * *

The trial judge gave a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellee because the operation showed that Mrs. Hall’s disease was one which could not have originated much less than a year before the policy was issued. We think that ruling was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants instituted this action against the appellee to recover some $700 on a medical benefits and accident policy. The insuring clause of the policy contained the following exclusion provision:

“(b) resulting from sickness which originates while this policy is in effect and more than fifteen days after the date hereof, hereinafter referred to as such sickness; * *

The trial judge gave a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellee because the operation showed that Mrs. Hall’s disease was one which could not have originated much less than a year before the policy was issued. We think that ruling was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall v. Reserve Life Ins. Co., 263 S.W.2d 933, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 638 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

263 S.W.2d 933 (Hall v. Reserve Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.