Hall v. Ponds

336 So. 2d 63, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4680
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. Ponds. Read the opinion of the Court — 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4565
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 20, 1976·No. No. 5594·Published

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

Following oral argument of this case, both parties learned they had received an incorrect notice of judgment indicating the trial court signed the judgment submitted by one party when in fact the trial court signed the judgment submitted by the other party. The appeal was perfected on the basis of the wrong judgment.

LSA-C.C.P. arts. 1913 and 1974 contemplate that the Clerk of Court shall mail a correct notice of judgment in order to begin the delays for taking an appeal.

[64] To protect both parties we are dismissing this appeal and remanding the case to the trial court to allow the parties to receive a correct notice of judgment. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164. The parties can then protect their interests by taking new appeals. Costs of this appeal will be taxed when this litigation is next before us.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Ponds, 336 So. 2d 63, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4680 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

336 So. 2d 63 (Hall v. Ponds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.