Hall v. Plumley

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. Plumley

621 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2015·No. No. 15-7073·Published

Opinion

[215] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Hall, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Hall’s petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Plumley, No. 5:15-cv-00051-FPS-RWT, 2015 WL 3952661 (ND.W.Va. June 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[215] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Hall, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Hall’s petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Plumley, No. 5:15-cv-00051-FPS-RWT, 2015 WL 3952661 (ND.W.Va. June 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hall v. Plumley, 621 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

621 F. App'x 214 (Hall v. Plumley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.