Hall v. Plumley

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. Plumley

621 F. App'x 214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2015

DocketNo. 15-7073

StatusPublished

This text of 621 F. App'x 214 (Hall v. Plumley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Plumley, 621 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

[215]*215Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Hall, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Hall’s petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Plumley, No. 5:15-cv-00051-FPS-RWT, 2015 WL 3952661 (ND.W.Va. June 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[215]*215Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Hall, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Hall’s petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Plumley, No. 5:15-cv-00051-FPS-RWT, 2015 WL 3952661 (ND.W.Va. June 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 F. App'x 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-plumley-ca4-2015.