Hall v. Phenix City

107 So. 221, 21 Ala. App. 247, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 43
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 1926·No. 4 Div. 153.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

For the purposes of -a determination of this appeal it appears, from the record, that the city of Phenix City had at the time of the adoption of the ordinance here in question a population of more than 3,000, and at that time there was published a newspaper of general circulation in Phenix City, and it further affirmatively appears that the ordinance, the basis of this prosecution, was not published as required by section 1999 of the Code of 1923, nor was it so published before the beginning of the prosecution in this case. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court convicting defendant of a violation of said ordinance was error.

Other questions presented are not neeeásary to a decision; but, for the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Phenix City, 107 So. 221, 21 Ala. App. 247, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 43 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

107 So. 221 (Hall v. Phenix City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Isler
134 So. 535 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)